🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ councils will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by first submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently spent years building community backing and urging their local governments to establish Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to keep their seats.