🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."