🔗 Share this article

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has revealed she is planning "targeted action to deal with household expense pressures" in the forthcoming financial statement.

During an interview with the BBC, she noted that lowering price rises is a joint responsibility of both the administration and the central bank.

The UK's price growth is projected to be the most elevated among the Group of Seven industrialized countries this calendar year and the following year.

Possible Energy Bill Interventions

It is understood the government could intervene to reduce energy bills, for instance by cutting the current 5% level of VAT charged on energy supplies.

A further approach is to reduce some of the policy costs currently included in bills.

Fiscal Limitations and Analyst Predictions

The government will receive the latest assessment from the official forecaster, the OBR, on Monday, which will show how much scope there is for such actions.

The expectation from the majority of experts is that Reeves will have to announce tax rises or budget cuts in order to adhere to her self-imposed borrowing rules.

Earlier on the same day, analysis indicated there was a £22bn gap for the Treasury chief to fill, which is at the lower end of expectations.

"There's a joint job between the Bank of England and the government to further reduce some of the causes of inflation," Reeves stated to reporters in the US capital, at the conferences of the IMF and global financial institution.

Tax Commitments and Global Concerns

While a great deal of the attention has been on probable tax rises, the chancellor said the most recent data from the OBR had not altered her pledge to campaign commitments not to increase rates on income tax, VAT or National Insurance.

She blamed an "uncertain global environment" with rising geopolitical and commercial concerns for the Budget tax moves, probably to be targeted on those "most able to pay."

Global Trade Tensions

Addressing worries about the United Kingdom's trade ties with China she said: "The UK's security interests invariably take priority."

Recent declaration by China to strengthen trade restrictions on critical minerals and other materials that are essential for advanced tech manufacturing led US President the US President to threaten an additional 100% import tax on goods from China, increasing the risk of an full-scale commercial conflict between the two largest economies.

The US Treasury Secretary called China's action "commercial pressure" and "a international production control attempt."

Asked about accepting the American proposal to join its dispute with China, the Chancellor said she was "very concerned" by China's measures and urged the Chinese government "not to put up barriers and restrict access."

She said the action was "damaging for the world economy and causes further obstacles."

"I believe there are sectors where we need to challenge China, but there are also important opportunities to sell into Chinese markets, including banking sector and other sectors of the economy. We've got to achieve that equilibrium appropriate."

The chancellor also confirmed she was working with international partners "on our own essential resources strategy, so that we are more independent."

NHS Drug Costs and Funding

Reeves also recognized that the cost the NHS pays for pharmaceuticals could rise as a result of ongoing negotiations with the US government and its drugs companies, in return for lower tariffs and capital.

A number of the world's largest pharmaceutical manufacturers have said lately that they are either halting or canceling operations in the UK, with some blaming the low prices they are obtaining.

Recently, the government science advisor said the price the NHS pays for medicines would must rise to stop businesses and pharmaceutical investment departing from the United Kingdom.

The Chancellor told media: "It has been observed due to the pricing regime, that clinical trials, recent pharmaceuticals have not been available in the United Kingdom in the extent that they are in other continental states."

"The objective is to guarantee that individuals getting care from the National Health Service are able to obtain the finest life-saving medicines in the globe. And so we are looking at all of that, and... looking to secure more capital into Britain."